When an illegal defensive player is involved and discovered before the first pitch to the next batter, which statement is true?

When an illegal defensive player is involved and discovered before the first pitch to the next batter, which statement is true?

• A. The offensive team has no options.
• B. The team on offense may choose to have the batter bat again.
• C. The team on offense may choose to let the play stand.
• D. Both B & C.

Answer: (D)

When an illegal defensive player is identified before the first pitch to the next batter, the offense has a remedy choice rather than an automatic penalty. The offensive team may elect to have the batter re-bat, or they may choose to let the previous result stand and continue with the next batter as if nothing happened. This dual option exists to balance fairness because the issue is discovered before any new pitch, so the offense can decide whether to reset the at-bat or proceed with the existing play. That’s why both options are valid.

When an illegal defensive player is identified before the first pitch to the next batter, the offense has a remedy choice rather than an automatic penalty. The offensive team may elect to have the batter re-bat, or they may choose to let the previous result stand and continue with the next batter as if nothing happened. This dual option exists to balance fairness because the issue is discovered before any new pitch, so the offense can decide whether to reset the at-bat or proceed with the existing play. That’s why both options are valid.